woof?
1271 stories
·
135 followers

Quoting Nov 12th letter from OpenAI to Judge Ona T. Wang

1 Share

On Monday, this Court entered an order requiring OpenAI to hand over to the New York Times and its co-plaintiffs 20 million ChatGPT user conversations [...]

OpenAI is unaware of any court ordering wholesale production of personal information at this scale. This sets a dangerous precedent: it suggests that anyone who files a lawsuit against an AI company can demand production of tens of millions of conversations without first narrowing for relevance. This is not how discovery works in other cases: courts do not allow plaintiffs suing Google to dig through the private emails of tens of millions of Gmail users irrespective of their relevance. And it is not how discovery should work for generative AI tools either.

Nov 12th letter from OpenAI to Judge Ona T. Wang, re: OpenAI, Inc., Copyright Infringement Litigation

Tags: openai, privacy, ai, llms, chatgpt, ai-ethics, generative-ai, law, new-york-times

Read the whole story
ChrisDL
13 hours ago
reply
New York
Share this story
Delete

#1577; The Objective Oracle

1 Share

[ 💬 Comment thread on Discord ]
[ 🔎 Detail view on Patreon ]

Read the whole story
ChrisDL
21 hours ago
reply
New York
Share this story
Delete

What I can change

1 Share

God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.

I think everyone has heard that before. I was vaguely familiar with it but it’s not a particularly core part of my life.

Or so I thought.

I’ve been reflecting a bit on larger-scale changes which are happening around me: the major geopolitical changes we’re seeing, the rise of AI, the latest Ruby drama, climate change, etc.

I realise now that my default response is to understand how to navigate this world as it is, not change it to how I believe it should be. Perhaps it’s the swimmer and the stoic in me: I’m swimming in the sea, adjusting my stroke, sighting for landmarks, and ploughing on because I can’t change the conditions. I can only change how I respond to them.

I can’t wish for the wind to stop blowing waves into my face when I breathe but I can turn my head to the other side. I can’t change the water temperature but I can have predicted these conditions and trained for it (or worn a wetsuit). I can’t make the fog lift but I can remember the course, sight more frequently, and follow other swimmers or the directions of kayakers. I can’t do anything when a storm cancels a swim but I can be ready if it doesn’t.

Others, I’ve noticed, are not like this. Perhaps stronger or braver, they rage against this tide. They scream at the injustice of it—as if life was supposed to be fair—and they rally others to the cause. They see a delta between how the world is and how they believe the world should be, and they believe they can change it. I guess? Or, at least, they seem to expend significant energy complaining about it.

I don’t.

That person is who they are. That company does what it does. That country is what it is. That government is exactly what they said they were. That situation happened. That technology does what it does. This industry is going that way. The climate is getting worse. Those incentives are aligned to inevitably produce this outcome. People are going to be who they are. I am who I am.

I can’t change much of that.

I’m so small in this world that all I can do is figure out what has happened or predict what’s going to happen, how that affects me (if at all), and how I react to it. I have control over myself, some influence over others around me, and a vanishingly small effect on the rest of the world.

This is mostly how I’m thinking about AI: It’s inevitable. There is so much money aligned behind AI that the incentives for powerful people, and frankly the entire US economy, mean that AI is going to be pushed and pushed and pushed. And even with the simplest of tasks and the most naive implementation, the hint at value is there. This is not crypto. This is not a solution searching for a problem that normal people have (who aren’t money launderers)1. AI is going to be widely available, widely distributed, and widely integrated.

Once you accept that AI is going to be a thing, you can start figuring out if it’s going to affect you (undoubtedly, yes). Then you can start plotting how you’ll react to it.

The future is the sea, AI is the prevailing weather conditions, and your career is the course you need to plot. What are you going to do about it? How will you adapt your stroke? How will you change your mindset? What need equipment or skills do you need? Or are you withdrawing from the race?

Putting your head in the sand, ignoring AI, protesting against its use or the crimes of its evangelical creators, or hoping it’ll go away is a losing strategy. It’s exhausting, it’s depressing, and it simply delays your actual reaction to the situation. It’s not getting you anywhere.

Stop screaming into the storm and start learning how to swim in it.

  1. Ironically, I actually think AI might provide a legitimate use-case for crypto if stablecoins are used for Agent-to-Agent commerce. We’ll see if that actually becomes a thing. It still feels like a solution searching for a problem. 

Read the whole story
ChrisDL
21 hours ago
reply
New York
Share this story
Delete

Rupert's Snub Cube and other Math Holes

2 Comments and 3 Shares
From: suckerpinch
Duration: 1:18:34
Views: 91,541

In this cross-over episode between the Main Sequence and Tom Academy, we see what it would take to prove that you can't do what you already thought you couldn't do, and learn about Tom's prurient interest in Platonic horrors. Yes, the whole 80 minutes is about cubes and their relatives.

Project site: http://tom7.org/ruperts/
Download shapes, code, paper, etc. there.
David's soothing video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=evKFok65t_E
David's verification of triakis tetrahedron: https://youtube.com/watch?v=jDTPBdxmxKw

7 trillion polyhedra were harmed in the making of this video.

Read the whole story
ChrisDL
1 day ago
reply
it's so good.
New York
jlvanderzwan
9 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
fxer
1 day ago
reply
1) this is what 2x playback speed was built for
2) we never should have let mathematicians learn to program!
3) fuckin’ fantastic
Bend, Oregon
jlvanderzwan
1 day ago
4) 100%-ing COD:BO6 and talking about it for four minutes in the middle of the video just as a set-up for a "speaking of nerd-sniping" punchline

A cartoonist's review of AI art

1 Comment and 9 Shares
A cartoonist's review of AI art

This is a comic about AI art.

View on my website

Read the whole story
ChrisDL
37 days ago
reply
agree to agree
New York
popular
35 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Life Is More Than an Engineering Problem, an interview with Ted Chiang...

1 Comment and 4 Shares
Life Is More Than an Engineering Problem, an interview with Ted Chiang from earlier this year. “I don’t believe it’s meaningful to say that something is better art absent any context of how it was created. Art is all about context.”

💬 Join the discussion on kottke.org →

Read the whole story
samuel
41 days ago
reply
Fantastic interview. So many good metaphors and stories from Ted Chiang, one of my favorite writers.
Cambridge, Massachusetts
ChrisDL
38 days ago
reply
New York
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories