woof?
1263 stories
·
135 followers

Quoting Bruce Schneier

1 Share

We simply don’t know to defend against these attacks. We have zero agentic AI systems that are secure against these attacks. Any AI that is working in an adversarial environment—and by this I mean that it may encounter untrusted training data or input—is vulnerable to prompt injection. It’s an existential problem that, near as I can tell, most people developing these technologies are just pretending isn’t there.

Bruce Schneier

Tags: prompt-injection, security, generative-ai, bruce-schneier, ai, llms, ai-agents

Read the whole story
ChrisDL
1 day ago
reply
New York
Share this story
Delete

Quoting Steve Wozniak

2 Shares

I gave all my Apple wealth away because wealth and power are not what I live for. I have a lot of fun and happiness. I funded a lot of important museums and arts groups in San Jose, the city of my birth, and they named a street after me for being good. I now speak publicly and have risen to the top. I have no idea how much I have but after speaking for 20 years it might be $10M plus a couple of homes. I never look for any type of tax dodge. I earn money from my labor and pay something like 55% combined tax on it. I am the happiest person ever. Life to me was never about accomplishment, but about Happiness, which is Smiles minus Frowns. I developed these philosophies when I was 18-20 years old and I never sold out.

Steve Wozniak, in a comment on Slashdot

Tags: apple, careers, slashdot

Read the whole story
ChrisDL
16 days ago
reply
New York
Share this story
Delete

Every 5×5 Nonogram

2 Comments
600k of 25 million Picross puzzles have been solved so far, with 1,400 people currently playing #
Read the whole story
ChrisDL
65 days ago
reply
Fun
New York
DMack
75 days ago
reply
hope I don't get the swastika
Victoria, BC
Share this story
Delete

100% effective

1 Comment and 2 Shares

Every time I get into an online conversation about prompt injection it's inevitable that someone will argue that a mitigation which works 99% of the time is still worthwhile because there's no such thing as a security fix that is 100% guaranteed to work.

I don't think that's true.

If I use parameterized SQL queries my systems are 100% protected against SQL injection attacks.

If I make a mistake applying those and someone reports it to me I can fix that mistake and now I'm back up to 100%.

If our measures against SQL injection were only 99% effective none of our digital activities involving relational databases would be safe.

I don't think it is unreasonable to want a security fix that, when applied correctly, works 100% of the time.

(I first argued a version of this back in September 2022 in You can’t solve AI security problems with more AI.)

Tags: sql-injection, security, prompt-injection

Read the whole story
ChrisDL
74 days ago
reply
New York
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
fxer
73 days ago
reply
> If I make a mistake applying those and someone reports it to me I can fix that mistake and now I'm back up to 100%.

Uhh doesn’t that imply you weren’t at 100% before, so can’t be certain you are now?
Bend, Oregon

Historical tech tree

1 Comment and 2 Shares

Interactive visualization of technological history.



Read the whole story
ChrisDL
81 days ago
reply
Cool
New York
Share this story
Delete

Quoting Oleg Pustovit

1 Comment

Microservices only pay off when you have real scaling bottlenecks, large teams, or independently evolving domains. Before that? You’re paying the price without getting the benefit: duplicated infra, fragile local setups, and slow iteration.

Oleg Pustovit, Microservices Are a Tax Your Startup Probably Can’t Afford

Tags: software-architecture, startups, microservices

Read the whole story
ChrisDL
114 days ago
reply
agreed
New York
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories